truth: the Anti-drugwar | ||
Homepage | Sitemap |
When assessing claims about THC content, it is important to have not only the measures of average THC content, but also the number of samples seized. Without knowing the number of samples, it is simply not possible to determine if the measure from one year is actually comparable to that from other years. Likewise, comparing across sample types is illustrative only to the extent that the number of samples is known. The importance of this is readily seen in the chart below in the data for hash oil THC content. In 2004, the potency of hash oil appears to have skyrocketed to an average of over 30 percent THC. But that is the average of only four samples. Clearly, we need to know not only what a given claim is, but also upon what the claim is actually based. As usual, when it comes to the war on drugs, what we aren't being told is much more important and useful than what we are being told. Clearly, a wide variety of average THC measures have been made over the years, but the raw data is confounded not only by the overall number of samples tested, but also by how the samples were treated. Since THC readily degrades in the presence of heat and light, many of the early years of sample data are essentially worthless as there were no quality control procedures in place. Later data has much greater fidelity since there are, in general, a larger number of samples for a given product type, and the samples themselves were handled with standardized procedures. Ultimately, what we need to know and still have no data for, are the highest recorded values for each type of cannabis product for each year. Everyone who was smoking cannabis back in the 1970's, and still does so today, will tell you flat out that the marijuana today is really no stronger than that from the past. That is because truly excellent cannabis products were indeed available back then. The big difference today is simply that there is wider availability of higher quality product. Stronger cannabis products aren't "more dangerous" -- they're just stronger, which means less product is required to get the same effect. It's quite similar to the range of alcohol products between beer and whiskey. Whiskey may be "10 times stronger" but the drug in question (alcohol) is still the same thing. |
Average THC Content in Seized Cannabis Samples (1972 - 2008) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hash Oil | Sinsemilla | Hashish | Marijuana | Thai Stick | Ditchweed | |||||||
Year | Number | Avg THC % | Number | Avg THC % | Number | Avg THC % | Number | Avg THC % | Number | Avg THC % | Number | Avg THC % |
1972 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 6 | 0.60 | 34 | 1.23 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
1973 | 6 | 22.00 | -- | -- | 11 | 1.00 | 33 | 0.83 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
1974 | 18 | 15.34 | -- | -- | 53 | 0.86 | 113 | 1.34 | 1 | 0.54 | -- | -- |
1975 | 29 | 13.09 | -- | -- | 86 | 2.28 | 149 | 1.05 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
1976 | 18 | 18.82 | -- | -- | 52 | 3.28 | 209 | 1.94 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
1977 | 17 | 18.89 | 15 | 3.20 | 44 | 1.81 | 235 | 1.27 | 1 | 4.91 | -- | -- |
1978 | 9 | 21.31 | 1 | 6.28 | 51 | 2.15 | 128 | 1.47 | 1 | 0.82 | -- | -- |
1979 | 9 | 20.91 | 10 | 3.66 | 43 | 2.32 | 191 | 1.58 | 1 | 0.13 | -- | -- |
1980 | 8 | 16.56 | 26 | 6.33 | 37 | 2.58 | 120 | 1.24 | 1 | 0.05 | 6 | 0.26 |
1981 | 5 | 17.45 | 31 | 6.58 | 13 | 2.91 | 209 | 1.83 | -- | -- | 20 | 0.32 |
1982 | 8 | 19.88 | 14 | 7.10 | 32 | 2.69 | 435 | 3.07 | 8 | 4.60 | 30 | 0.44 |
1983 | 30 | 21.36 | 17 | 7.87 | 47 | 5.47 | 1145 | 3.30 | 7 | 4.17 | 60 | 0.45 |
1984 | 33 | 16.75 | 36 | 6.67 | 59 | 5.75 | 1030 | 3.31 | 3 | 5.71 | 50 | 0.42 |
1985 | 25 | 15.08 | 52 | 7.28 | 41 | 6.49 | 1448 | 2.83 | 1 | 6.26 | 102 | 0.48 |
1986 | 23 | 16.51 | 32 | 8.43 | 53 | 2.66 | 1372 | 2.37 | 6 | 3.73 | 124 | 0.31 |
1987 | 22 | 13.36 | 43 | 7.93 | 63 | 2.62 | 1551 | 2.96 | 3 | 4.45 | 86 | 0.34 |
1988 | 16 | 8.52 | 98 | 7.62 | 43 | 3.35 | 1640 | 3.18 | 2 | 3.37 | 69 | 0.39 |
1989 | 9 | 11.96 | 86 | 6.95 | 19 | 7.06 | 1075 | 3.04 | -- | -- | 104 | 0.29 |
1990 | 12 | 16.60 | 61 | 10.10 | 38 | 5.30 | 1108 | 3.24 | 1 | 0.12 | 78 | 0.33 |
1991 | 10 | 13.07 | 75 | 10.53 | 31 | 5.21 | 2149 | 3.09 | -- | -- | 246 | 0.31 |
1992 | 22 | 13.85 | 76 | 8.57 | 61 | 5.35 | 3336 | 3.08 | -- | -- | 107 | 0.31 |
1993 | 17 | 16.52 | 123 | 5.77 | 39 | 6.60 | 3033 | 3.38 | -- | -- | 189 | 0.37 |
1994 | 14 | 11.57 | 104 | 7.49 | 29 | 4.60 | 3032 | 3.50 | -- | -- | 136 | 0.38 |
1995 | 13 | 13.23 | 164 | 7.51 | 19 | 3.60 | 4430 | 3.73 | 2 | 4.52 | 149 | 0.41 |
1996 | 8 | 12.82 | 168 | 9.23 | 12 | 2.52 | 2148 | 3.87 | -- | -- | 115 | 0.38 |
1997 | 10 | 18.20 | 111 | 11.62 | 31 | 8.92 | 2273 | 4.25 | -- | -- | 57 | 0.49 |
1998 | 5 | 15.78 | 101 | 12.33 | 15 | 5.87 | 2075 | 4.22 | -- | -- | 81 | 0.39 |
1999 | 11 | 16.21 | 136 | 13.38 | 23 | 4.94 | 2450 | 4.18 | -- | -- | 59 | 0.37 |
2000 | 7 | 28.58 | 113 | 12.80 | 27 | 4.37 | 2928 | 4.67 | 1 | 3.27 | 69 | 0.35 |
2001 | 7 | 19.44 | 235 | 9.55 | 13 | 8.48 | 2398 | 5.02 | -- | -- | 59 | 0.43 |
2002 | 5 | 22.51 | 528 | 11.36 | 16 | 9.12 | 1789 | 5.11 | -- | -- | 67 | 0.40 |
2003 | 4 | 15.54 | 538 | 11.59 | 16 | 9.23 | 1893 | 4.97 | -- | -- | 57 | 0.38 |
2004 | 4 | 31.32 | 731 | 11.91 | 25 | 18.95 | 1815 | 5.38 | -- | -- | 53 | 0.34 |
2005 | 6 | 6.40 | 932 | 11.63 | 47 | 11.98 | 1964 | 5.25 | -- | -- | 52 | 0.37 |
2006 | 3 | 18.74 | 1032 | 11.20 | 32 | 29.33 | 1770 | 5.58 | -- | -- | 49 | 0.30 |
2007 | 18 | 24.85 | 1327 | 11.08 | 70 | 27.71 | 1635 | 6.11 | -- | -- | 40 | 0.39 |
2008 | 12 | 6.54 | 1068 | 11.46 | 50 | 23.14 | 1102 | 5.81 | -- | -- | 26 | 0.43 |
Sources: University of Mississippi, Marijuana Potency Monitoring Project*
* The Marijuana Potency Monitoring project is sponsored by the US National Institute on Drug Abuse. The sources of the numbers quoted here are as follows:
Average THC content in UK samples 1975 - 1981 Claims of THC content and marijuana potency from press reporting. |
truth: the Anti-drugwar | ||
Homepage | Sitemap |